From: The renewable energy debate: how Austrian electric utilities are changing their business models
Utility-side business model for renewable energies | Customer-side business model for renewable energies | |
---|---|---|
Product, value proposition | Electricity remains commodity–the value proposition basically remains the same | Shift from commodity delivery to energy service provider |
Additional value for the customer through more environmentally friendly production | New value propositions need to be developed | |
Customer interface | Relationship with customers remains largely unchanged | Better customer relationship is required to develop new value propositions |
Customer segmentation allows customer base to be increased and an ‘eco’ price premium may be earned | Customer segments change | |
New channels are needed | ||
Channels mainly remain the same | ||
Chance to improve corporate image and rebuild trust | ||
Infrastructure management | Small number of large-scale assets | Large number of small-scale assets |
Experienced in large-scale infrastructure projects | No experience with development and operation of small-scale projects | |
Partnerships with project developers and suppliers | Partnerships with system suppliers and local installation companies | |
Financial aspects | Revenues through feed-in of electricity | Revenues from feed-in and/or from services, source, and level of revenues unclear |
Revenue models are available | ||
New revenue models need to be developed | ||
Cost structures reflect utilities’ experiences with large-scale infrastructure financing | ||
Cost structure becomes more complex due to need for many small investments instead of a few large investments | ||
Economies of scale from large-scale projects and project portfolios | ||
High transaction costs reduce profits |