Skip to main content

Table 10 Strongest parameter contributions to variance of WSFP and GWP100 results

From: Uncertainty analysis of the environmental sustainability of biofuels

WSFP

 

Flow

Process

CTV (%)

Stage

Product

Husked nuts harvesting, at farm

26.72

x

Natgas

Palm fruit bunches, at farm

25.81

x

Natgas

Rape seed IP, at farm

9.31

x

Biogas

Protein peas, IP, at farm

8.99

x

Biogas

Soy beans IP, at farm

8.97

x

Biogas

Potatoes IP, at farm

6.61

x

Biogas

Potato seed IP, at farm

6.52

x

Biogas

Sugarcane, at farm

3.03

x

Biogas

Blue water consumption in CH

Rape seed extensive, at farm

0.50

B

Biogas

Maize seed organic, at farm

0.35

x

Biogas

GWP100

 

Flow

 

CTV (%)

Stage

Product

Biogas, from biowaste, at storage

0.38

x

Biogas

Biogas, from sewage sludge, at storage

0.37

x

Biogas

Methane, 96 vol-%, from biogas, at purification

0.36

x

Biogas

Methane, 96 vol-%, from biogas, high pressure, at consumer

0.35

x

Biogas

Disposal, municipal solid waste

0.35

x

Biogas

Methane, 96 vol-%, from biogas, production mix, at service station

0.34

x

Biogas

Natural gas, burned in boiler atm low-NOx condensing non-modulating <100 kW

0.33

x

Biogas

Electricity, at cogen with biogas

0.32

x

Biogas

Crude oil, at production onshore

0.32

x

Natgas

Disposal, plastics, mixture, 15.3 % water

0.32

x

Biogas