Indicator | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Stability | Formal institutions are stable in Chile compared to its Latin American neighbors. | Â |
Regulation and standards | Technical standards and regulations for PV systems have been defined (GEF/UNDP program). | Standards not mandatory and not necessarily used in tenders. |
Decentralization and openness to participation | Engagement of communities, in some projects, for example, in the case of the Coquimbo and Huatacondo projects. | Lack of (technical) know-how in rural areas (which has affected some PER projects). |
Participation is still understood as the provision of information, rather than the engagement of the community from cradle to grave. | ||
Adaptability | Â | Chile lacks a decentralized agency for overseeing off-grid electrification projects. |
Affordability | Initial investment is covered by the FNDR. | No cross-subsidies aimed at covering off-grid costs (from users connected to the grid, for example). |
Cost-effectiveness | The new Energy Agenda considers the substitution of projects based on diesel generators for cost-effective solutions based on PV. | Decisions have been made based on the initial costs only, not considering O&M costs or environmental impacts (life-cycle costs). |
Consideration of O&M costs | Â | The costs for O&M of PER-sponsored projects have to be annually approved by the SUBDERE (thus causing uncertainties). |
Contribution to income of users | PV programs for productive use (such as those sponsored by the INDAP) widespread. | Â |
Reliability of supply | Ex-post project evaluations found that most of the systems of the PER program were operational. | Reliability depends on the engagement/proactivity and technical skills of the community, which may threaten the sustainability of these projects. |
Environmental awareness | The younger population exhibits higher awareness on environmental issues. | Selection criteria for a technology are still exclusively based on direct costs without considering the environmental impacts. |
Environmental impact | GEF/UNDP environmental standards for disposal have been established. | As environmental standards are not mandatory, battery disposal is often not considered in the projects. |
Accessibility (disparity, equity) | High electrification rate in Chile (99% national; 97% rural). | Indigenous communities still have less access to electricity, since communities have to request electrification at first place. This approach favors better organized communities leaving behind others—normally the poorest indigenous communities. |
Social acceptance (accuracy) | System size has been upgraded in many local projects. Training on the energy model HOMER for staff of the Ministry of Energy. | As no minimum capacity is defined, inaccurate solutions often lead the rejection of off-grid PV systems. |
Cultural justice | Chilean officials are aware of the importance of local participation. Indeed, cultural factors (gender, ethnical background, roles within a community) are considered in the programs. | Â |