Table 4 Average efficiency scores and rankings

Hokkaido

0.57

44

0.65

25

Aomori

0.73

32

0.66

23

Iwate

0.75

27

0.65

26

Miyagi

0.83

15

0.72

14

Akita

0.80

18

0.72

11

Yamagata

0.78

22

0.63

30

Fukushima

0.79

21

0.65

24

Ibaraki

0.85

8

0.72

13

Tochigi

0.84

11

0.70

17

Gunma

0.76

24

0.62

32

Saitama

0.89

2

0.79

5

Chiba

0.88

3

0.80

4

Tokyo

0.87

7

0.81

3

Kanagawa

0.91

1

0.87

1

Niigata

0.80

20

0.66

22

Toyama

0.59

42

0.48

44

Ishikawa

0.52

46

0.43

46

Fukui

0.39

47

0.33

47

Yamanashi

0.70

34

0.57

36

Nagano

0.60

40

0.50

40

Gifu

0.76

26

0.60

34

Shizuoka

0.83

12

0.70

18

Aichi

0.84

10

0.71

16

Mie

0.75

29

0.63

31

Shiga

0.65

37

0.50

41

Kyoto

0.62

39

0.53

39

Osaka

0.80

19

0.68

21

Hyogo

0.82

16

0.71

15

Nara

0.77

23

0.63

29

Wakayama

0.52

45

0.46

45

Tottori

0.59

43

0.50

43

Shimane

0.63

38

0.55

37

Okayama

0.65

36

0.55

38

Hiroshima

0.73

31

0.64

27

Yamaguchi

0.75

30

0.69

19

Tokushima

0.59

41

0.50

42

Kagawa

0.68

35

0.57

35

Ehime

0.72

33

0.64

28

Kochi

0.75

28

0.69

20

Fukuoka

0.83

14

0.73

10

Saga

0.76

25

0.62

33

Nagasaki

0.83

13

0.75

9

Kumamoto

0.87

6

0.78

6

Oita

0.81

17

0.72

12

Miyazaki

0.85

9

0.78

7

Kagoshima

0.88

4

0.84

2

Okinawa

0.87

5

0.76

8