Skip to main content

Table 5 Change rates (%) of average scores over time

From: Determinants of efficiency in residential electricity demand: stochastic frontier analysis on Japan

  Model A Model B
Hokkaido − 0.61 − 1.83
Aomori − 0.83 − 2.57
Iwate − 2.01 − 3.86
Miyagi − 1.37 − 3.36
Akita − 2.21 − 3.79
Yamagata − 2.35 − 4.45
Fukushima − 1.46 − 3.64
Ibaraki − 0.76 − 2.57
Tochigi − 1.20 − 3.32
Gunma − 2.00 − 4.08
Saitama − 0.30 − 1.57
Chiba − 0.38 − 1.57
Tokyo − 0.33 − 1.46
Kanagawa − 0.14 − 0.81
Niigata − 1.88 − 4.05
Toyama − 5.75 − 7.05
Ishikawa − 5.78 − 7.24
Fukui − 7.10 − 8.64
Yamanashi − 1.80 − 3.91
Nagano − 3.33 − 4.97
Gifu − 2.36 − 4.42
Shizuoka − 1.46 − 3.51
Aichi − 0.93 − 2.84
Mie − 2.06 − 3.93
Shiga − 4.26 − 5.96
Kyoto − 2.82 − 4.64
Osaka − 0.94 − 2.95
Hyogo − 1.44 − 3.28
Nara − 2.56 − 4.37
Wakayama − 4.83 − 6.04
Tottori − 5.27 − 6.47
Shimane − 4.84 − 6.06
Okayama − 4.10 − 5.58
Hiroshima − 3.18 − 4.67
Yamaguchi − 3.55 − 4.65
Tokushima − 4.25 − 5.60
Kagawa − 3.65 − 5.17
Ehime − 2.85 − 4.32
Kochi − 2.42 − 3.72
Fukuoka − 0.98 − 2.88
Saga − 3.35 − 5.21
Nagasaki − 0.94 − 2.74
Kumamoto − 0.86 − 2.65
Oita − 1.68 − 3.44
Miyazaki − 1.11 − 2.74
Kagoshima − 0.64 − 1.76
Okinawa − 1.18 − 3.25