|
No.
|
Participants per stakeholder group
|
Factor 1
|
Factor 2
|
Factor 3
|
Factor 4
|
|---|
|
1
|
National electricity company
|
0.84
|
0.15
|
0.17
|
0.22
|
|
2
|
Local administration
|
0.81
|
0.29
|
0.03
|
0.10
|
|
3
|
Local administration
|
0.78
|
0.26
|
0.10
|
0.17
|
|
4
|
Cantonal administration (Energy and Transport)
|
0.68
|
0.08
|
0.41
|
0.30
|
|
5
|
Local resident
|
0.67
|
0.36
|
0.13
|
0.17
|
|
6
|
Local administration
|
0.66
|
0.04
|
−0.03
|
0.37
|
|
7
|
Local resident
|
0.65
|
0.36
|
0.27
|
0.38
|
|
8
|
Local resident
|
0.59
|
0.38
|
0.28
|
0.03
|
|
9
|
National electricity company
|
0.59
|
−0.01
|
0.25
|
−0.04
|
|
10
|
Local resident
|
0.48
|
0.14
|
0.04
|
0.27
|
|
11
|
Local resident
|
0.18
|
0.63
|
0.09
|
0.25
|
|
12
|
Federal Commission for Avalanche and Rockfall
|
0.12
|
0.57
|
0.02
|
−0.01
|
|
13
|
Local resident
|
0.30
|
0.21
|
0.73
|
0.19
|
|
14
|
Local resident
|
0.36
|
0.42
|
0.59
|
0.22
|
|
15
|
Environmental NGO
|
0.11
|
0.34
|
0.45
|
−0.23
|
|
16
|
Local resident
|
−0.01
|
− 0.10
|
0.68
|
0.19
|
|
17
|
Local administration
|
0.22
|
0.36
|
0.17
|
0.63
|
|
18
|
Cantonal administration (Buildings security)
|
0.32
|
−0.01
|
0.21
|
0.69
|
|
19
|
Environmental NGO
|
0.47
|
0.53
|
0.41
|
0.28
|
| |
Eigenvalue
|
5.3
|
2.1
|
2.2
|
1.8
|
| |
Variance (%)
|
27.9
|
11.0
|
11.8
|
9.1
|
| |
Cumulative Variance (%)
|
28
|
39
|
51
|
60
|
| |
Humphrey’s rule (I)
|
11
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
| |
Humphrey’s rule (II)
|
0.68
|
0.57
|
0.68
|
0.44
|
- Participants loading significantly at a level of p < 0.01, exceeding ± 0.442, are highlighted in bold. The confounded participants are highlighted in italics. Values in bold and italics are both loading significantly at a level of p < 0.01, exceeding ± 0.442 and confounded
