Skip to main content

Table 5 Analysis of sufficient conditions for rejection (y) (based on the Quine-McCluskey algorithms, without logical remainders, on basis of truth table in Additional file 6)

From: Acceptability of innovative biomass heating plants in a German case study—a contribution to cultural landscape management and local energy supply

Assumptions Cases Raw coverage Unique coverage Consistency
ethics*interest*readybarrier*SATISFY*NOMAT Farmers 13 and 17 0.203 0.163 1.000
ETHICS*interest*READYBARRIER*NOMAT Farmers 6, 10, and 16 0.305 0.127 1.000
ETHICS*INTEREST*SATISF*nomat Farmers 5, 7, and 14 0.228 0.152 1.000
ETHICS*INTEREST*satisf*NOMAT Farmers 8 and 9 0.144 0.033 1.000
ETHICS*INTEREST*readybarrier*NOMAT Farmers 2, 9, 11, and 15 0.338 0.101 1.000
  1. Solution coverage 0.822; solution consistency 1.000