From: Understanding the role of values in institutional change: the case of the energy transition
Framework element | Definition | Source |
---|---|---|
Biophysical/Material Conditions | Physical environment influencing possible actions taken in action situations, e.g., existing infrastructure | McGinnis [14] |
Attributes of Community | Socio-economic characteristics of the participants’ community | Ostrom et al. [21] |
Rules | Institutions, e.g., formal laws and regulations that enable and constrain behavior of participants | Ostrom [3] |
Action Situation | Social space of interaction, in which participants decide on their individual actions given the information they have about how those actions lead to outcomes and the costs and benefits associated with those actions and outcomes | McGinnis [14] |
Participants | Individual actors or actor groups, e.g., governmental and non-governmental bodies or firms | Ostrom [13] |
Interactions | Procedural aspects, i.e., interaction among participants in an action situation | Ostrom et al. [21] |
Outcomes | Results of interactions, which may be institutions, knowledge, or operational outcomes such as the implementation of new technologies | Pahl-Wostl et al. [23] |
Evaluative Criteria | Criteria that are used to assess interactions and outcomes, e.g., sustainability, distributional equity, economic efficiency | Ostrom [13] |
Feedback and learning processes | Impact of actors’ evaluations of interaction patterns and outcomes on action situation and exogenous variables | McGinnis [14] |
Single loop learning | Process leading to an incremental adjustment of patterns of interactions within one policy process | Diduck et al. [34] |
Double loop learning | Process leading to change of principles that underlie future action situations, e.g., procedural aspects of decision-making | Diduck et al. [34] |
Triple loop learning | Process leading to changes in the existing exogenous variables | Armitage et al. [26] |