| C1: Modeling potentials of technologies and concepts | C2: Integrated scenario building—national energy modeling | C3: Regional modeling | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General objective(s) | Analyze the future energy demands of private households | Translate the motif of ‘socio-technical’ scenarios into the field of national energy transition scenarios | Analyze the regional idiosyncrasies of the German energy transition at the level of the regional planning |
Researcher constellation
|
|
| |
| |||
| Spectrum of disciplines |
Economists Engineers Political scientists |
Economists Engineers Political scientists Social scientists Communication scientists Physicists Philosophers Psychologists Legal scientists Natural scientists |
Economists Engineers CIB method experts Philosophers |
| Applied model(s) | A technology-based simulation model focusing on the building sector (JEMS-BTSa) | A technology-based national energy system model using the accounting framework Mesap/PlaNetb |
Economic input–output Logit car ownership model Mathematical optimization of electricity and heat supply Life cycle assessment |
| Time horizon | 2030 | 2050 | 2030 |
| Context scope |
International National Sectoral |
International National |
National Regional |
| CIB descriptorsc |
8 Direct linkable 16 Soft linkable 18 Indirect linkable |
10 Direct linkable 7 Soft linkable 22 Indirect linkable |
5 Direct linkable 3 Soft linkable 1 Indirect linkable |
| Consistent scenarios applied for linking | 4 Scenarios | 4 Scenarios | 1 Scenario |
| Reference on case study | Vögele et al. [28] | Pregger et al. [32] | Weimer-Jehle et al. [66], chapter 6.3 (no peer-reviewed article available) |