Table 5 Meta-efficiency scores and thermal power and hydropower rankings in 2013 and 2017

Beijing

20

1

5

1.1656

15

0.8217

Tianjin

15

14

–

–

–

–

Hebei

14

5

27

0.8897

27

0.5852

Liaoning

16

25

16

0.9743

25

0.6311

Shanghai

8

9

–

–

–

–

Jiangsu

3

2

23

0.9368

2

1.3506

Zhejiang

9

7

8

1.0164

21

0.7283

Fujian

13

16

9

1.0111

19

0.7633

Shandong

5

4

28

0.8475

28

0.3363

Guangdong

7

10

11

0.9867

24

0.6594

Hainan

18

23

7

1.0234

8

0.9874

Eastern group average

2

1

2

0.9835

3

0.7626

Shanxi

6

22

22

0.9426

18

0.7830

Inner Mongolia

4

8

21

0.9486

26

0.6198

Jilin

28

30

10

0.9873

20

0.7485

Heilongjiang

26

26

24

0.9363

16

0.8159

Anhui

12

11

19

0.9497

22

0.7203

Jiangxi

27

6

14

0.9769

23

0.6871

Henan

10

15

13

0.9833

14

0.8528

Hubei

21

12

6

1.0403

6

1.0184

Hunan

24

13

15

0.9758

17

0.7878

Guangxi

1

20

12

0.9867

12

0.9139

Central group average

1

2

3

0.9727

2

0.7947

Chongqing

25

21

26

0.9184

13

0.9037

Sichuan

29

18

4

1.2139

3

1.2117

Guizhou

19

27

17

0.9552

11

0.9192

Yunnan

30

29

1

1.6576

1

1.6925

Shaanxi

17

17

20

0.9487

5

1.0476

Gansu

23

24

3

1.2182

4

1.0781

Qinghai

22

28

2

1.4576

9

0.9642

Ningxia

2

3

18

0.9530

10

0.9460

Xinjiang

11

19

25

0.9256

7

1.0156

Western group average

3

3

1

1.1387

1

1.0865

Total mean

–

–

–

1.0295

–

0.8782