Skip to main content

Table 2 Factor decomposition of energy demand by Japanese region (1990–2011)

From: Regional energy demand in Japan: dynamic shift-share analysis

  Rate of change in energy demand (%) National effect Compositional effect Regional effect
  (i) + (ii) + (iii) (i) (ii) (iii)
Hokkaido 0.50 0.28 0.29 −0.07
Tohoku 0.65 0.28 0.27 0.09
Kita-Kanto 0.74 0.28 −0.07 0.53
Capital Region 0.36 0.28 0.08 0.00
Chubu 0.03 0.28 −0.03 −0.22
Hokuriku 0.29 0.28 0.24 −0.23
Kansai 0.01 0.28 0.09 −0.36
Chugoku 0.19 0.28 −0.42 0.33
Shikoku 0.41 0.28 −0.09 0.22
Kyushu 0.27 0.28 −0.08 0.07
Okinawa 1.22 0.28 0.60 0.34
  1. Notes:
  2. 1. The rate of change is the annual average (%) for 1990–2011
  3. 2. The regions are broken down as follows:
  4. Hokkaido (Hokkaido)
  5. Tohoku (Aomori, Iwate, Miyagi, Akita, Yamagata, Fukushima, Niigata)
  6. Kita-Kanto (Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Yamanashi)
  7. Capital Region (Saitama, Chiba, Tokyo, Kanagawa)
  8. Chubu (Nagano, Gifu, Shizuoka, Aichi, Mie)
  9. Hokuriku (Toyama, Ishikawa, Fukui)
  10. Kansai (Shiga, Kyoto, Osaka, Hyogo, Nara, Wakayama)
  11. Chugoku (Tottori, Shimane, Okayama, Hiroshima, Yamaguchi)
  12. Shikoku (Tokushima, Kagawa, Ehime, Kochi)
  13. Kyushu (Fukuoka, Saga, Nagasaki, Kumamoto, Oita, Miyazaki, Kagoshima)
  14. Okinawa (Okinawa)
Back to article page

Energy, Sustainability and Society

ISSN: 2192-0567

Contact us