Table 5 Factor decomposition of the regional effect in Japan
From: Regional energy demand in Japan: dynamic shift-share analysis
| Â | Regional effect | Energy-intensity effect | Production effect |
|---|---|---|---|
Hokkaido | −0.07 | 0.18 | −0.27 |
Aomori | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.15 |
Iwate | −0.05 | 0.08 | −0.12 |
Miyagi | 0.40 | 0.66 | −0.27 |
Akita | 0.29 | 0.66 | −0.35 |
Yamagata | −0.15 | 0.14 | −0.26 |
Fukushima | 0.02 | 0.40 | −0.35 |
Ibaraki | 0.83 | 0.43 | 0.48 |
Tochigi | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.14 |
Gunma | −0.02 | −0.24 | 0.25 |
Saitama | 0.05 | −0.18 | 0.23 |
Chiba | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0.17 |
Tokyo | −0.62 | −0.53 | −0.09 |
Kanagawa | 0.33 | 0.43 | −0.06 |
Niigata | −0.02 | −0.12 | 0.10 |
Toyama | −0.46 | −0.33 | −0.10 |
Ishikawa | −0.10 | 0.27 | −0.37 |
Fukui | 0.01 | −0.24 | 0.26 |
Yamanashi | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
Nagano | −0.18 | −0.33 | 0.17 |
Gifu | 0.04 | 0.08 | −0.03 |
Shizuoka | −0.52 | −0.82 | 0.37 |
Aichi | −0.12 | −0.34 | 0.31 |
Mie | −0.21 | −0.76 | 0.60 |
Shiga | 0.09 | −0.59 | 0.70 |
Kyoto | −0.18 | −0.27 | 0.11 |
Osaka | −0.83 | −0.13 | −0.68 |
Hyogo | 0.03 | 0.41 | −0.36 |
Nara | 0.18 | 0.41 | −0.24 |
Wakayama | −0.21 | −0.59 | 0.42 |
Tottori | 1.05 | 1.80 | −0.74 |
Shimane | 0.00 | −0.08 | 0.06 |
Okayama | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.28 |
Hiroshima | −0.09 | −0.01 | −0.02 |
Yamaguchi | 1.12 | 0.90 | 0.25 |
Tokushima | −0.11 | −0.75 | 0.64 |
Kagawa | −0.08 | −0.25 | 0.19 |
Ehime | 0.63 | 0.26 | 0.40 |
Kochi | −0.02 | 0.46 | −0.50 |
Fukuoka | −0.43 | −0.79 | 0.35 |
Saga | 0.77 | 0.55 | 0.23 |
Nagasaki | −0.26 | −0.46 | 0.19 |
Kumamoto | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.04 |
Oita | 0.57 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
Miyazaki | −0.14 | −0.43 | 0.27 |
Kagoshima | 0.48 | 0.16 | 0.29 |
Okinawa | 0.34 | −0.27 | 0.60 |