Skip to main content

Table 2 Induced economic impacts of household expenditure by community under the three power plant scenarios: continuing to burn coal, shutting down the power plant, and conversion of the power plant to biomass

From: Assessment of potential local and regional induced economic impact of an energy policy change in rural Northwestern Ontario

    

Scenarios

Market

Spatial

Distance (km)

Multiplier

Coal

Shutdown

Biomass

Atikokan

Locally

0

0.50

$41.4M

$36.1M

$42.0M

Fort Frances

Regionally

150

0.10

$8.3M

$7.2M

$8.4M

Thunder Bay

Regionally

210

0.20

$16.5M

$14.4M

$16.8M

Dryden

Regionally

210

0.05

$4.1M

$3.6M

$4.2M

USA

Out of region

>210

0.10

$8.3M

$7.2M

$8.4M

Other

Out of region

>210

0.05

$4.1M

$3.6M

$4.2M

   

Est. grand total spending ($)

$82.7M

$72.1M

$83.9M

  1. Regional out-shopping multipliers are based on Knowles [73], with Atikokan capturing 50 % of the market, Fort Frances 10 %, Thunder Bay 20 %, Dryden 5 %, USA 10 %, and Other 5 %
  2. NOTE: Source file included separately