Skip to main content

Table 4 Scores for the environmental sustainability dimension

From: Sustainability assessment of a micro hydropower plant in Nepal

Themes

Dimensional weighting (%)

Code

Indicators

Score

Notes on scoring

Theme score

Law

15

ENV1

Compliance with legislation

4

Working policies are largely implemented (integration with irrigation, education, health, small-scale industry; use of locally available skill where possible; technical assistance from DDC), minor points are missing (no integration with drinking water, late decision for subsidies with Subsidy Policy 2011/12)

4.00

Aquatic ecosystem

15

ENV2

Level of interference with fish population and other aquatic species

4

No major impact on fish population

4.00

ENV3

Interruption of river continuum, inverse to quality of fish bypass system

0

Unable to score

ENV4

Share of water taken from the river

4

Share of water taken from river is adequate and could even be exploited more, provided that share complies with regulations

Recreation

15

ENV5

Landscape

3

Some visible impacts on landscape beauty due to electricity poles and transmission lines

3.00

ENV6

Noise emissions from powerhouse

3

No disturbance for villagers except for operator, who sleeps in the power house

 

Land

15

ENV7

Erosion

4

Vulnerability to erosion is low, canal made of concrete

4.60

ENV8

Sedimentation

5

Desilting tank and regular cleaning/maintenance as model recommendation

Climate change

40

ENV9

Fossil fuels avoided (GHG emissions)

4

Feasibility study goals are reached (kerosene demand reduced to 0.5 l/m-HH) and could be surpassed slightly

4.00

ENV10

Rate of deforestation

4

Firewood consumption is reduced remarkably by MHP electricity

ENV11

Flood protection

4

Curbstones are placed in vulnerable section of a headrace canal. Inundation area at intake seems adequate, minor criticism—dispersed area; it could be better structured

Aggregated score—environmental dimension

3.94