Skip to main content

Table 6 Predicted probability of support for tidal energy at specified values for variables using multinomial probit

From: Information flow to increase support for tidal energy development in remote islands of a developing country: agent-based simulation of information flow in Flores Timur Regency, Indonesia

Hierarchy

Coll. OutFav

Indi. OutFav

Education

Age

Prob

 

Case 1

 Level 1

0

2

6

6

0.65

(3.36)

***

 Level 2

0

2

4

5

0.58

(3.56)

***

 Level 3

0

2

3

3

0.38

(2.33)

**

 Level 4

0

2

2

3

0.32

(1.89)

**

Case 2

 Level 1

0

2

6

6

0.65

(3.36)

***

 Level 2

0

2

4

5

0.58

(3.56)

***

 Level 3

1

2

3

3

0.30

(3.43)

***

 Level 4

1

2

2

3

0.26

(2.51)

**

Case 3

 Level 1

1

2

6

6

0.57

(3.29)

***

 Level 2

1

2

4

5

0.50

(4.57)

***

 Level 3

0

2

3

3

0.38

(2.33)

**

 Level 4

0

2

2

3

0.32

(1.89)

**

  1. z-value is indicated in parentheses with probability
  2. “Level” indicates social hierarchy. For instance, Level 1 denotes the top hierarchical group with level 4 denoting the bottom hierarchical group
  3. Coll. OutFav indicates the variable “Collective outcome favourability” asked in the field survey. It has three values 0, 1, and 2, respectively, denoting disagree, neither agree nor disagree, and agree
  4. Indi. OutFav indicates the variable “Individual outcome favourability” asked in the field survey. It has three values 0, 1, and 2, respectively, denoting disagree, neither agree nor disagree, and agree
  5. Education, asked in the field survey, is variable with values ranging from 1 to 6 denoting different categories
  6. Age, asked in the field survey, is variable with values ranging from 1 to 6 denoting different categories
  7. *** and ** indicate p-value < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively