Skip to main content

Table 1 Four governance modalities and their underlying features

From: Urban electricity governance and the (re)production of heterogeneous electricity constellations in Dar es Salaam

  

Hierarchical

Market-based

Network-based

Managerial

Institutional features

Mechanisms of interaction/logic of decision-making

Top-down, command and control

Commercial exchange; price signals

Participatory, member-led; negotiations and informal exchange of views and interests

Authoritative/autonomous; may involve quasi-deliberations (‘choreographed participation’)

Rule structures

Rule of law, fixed procedures (incl. political programs)

Formal and informal rules of exchange

Informal (self-defined) rules, cultural values; rules and procedures are flexible (evolving through, and shaping practices)

Formal, yet flexible rules, focused on achieving targets

Actor features

Associated actors

State actors such as ministries, regulatory authorities, and municipal administrations, development partners

Public utility companies and private companies, individuals as co-providers

Users (both individual and collective, as associations), housing associations, NGOs, local bureaucrats

Civil servants, public or semi-public entities (e.g., utility companies), public–private partnerships, development partners

Actor participation and relationships

Key actors able to autonomously decide on others’ involvement

Ideal: open participation; in reality, hindered by entry barriers (monopolies or oligopolies)

Participation only open to associated members; members decide about participation

Bureaucratic and contractual relations determined by key actors

Key actor objectives/motivation

Public service delivery; achievement of political goals, electoral support

Profit maximization, increased market share, improvement of revenue base, safeguarding rent extraction

Improved position of participants or members (e.g., better access to services, economic or political standing, etc.)

Efficient delivery of determined outputs, minimizing reliance on external funding (autonomy)

Power basis

Mostly from within the politico-legal system; financial capacity, or membership statutes (e.g., international organizations)

Competitiveness (prices, ability to respond to demand, ability to maintain market share/position)

Shared resources, social capital, leadership: can be appropriated by powerful individuals to determine rules and procedures

Legal mandate, technical and economic expertise; managerial knowledge, economic resources

Policy tools

Commonly associated instruments

Laws, directives, regulations, permits, norms and standards

Contracts and informal commercial agreements, trading mechanisms

Written and unwritten agreements; entitlements

Price/cost and output-driven techno-managerial tools (performance measurement, targets, and benchmarks)

  1. Source: Author synopsis based on, e.g., [15, 24, 25, 39, 42]