Variable | Model I | Model II | Model III | Model IV | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | EXP (B) | B | EXP (B) | B | EXP (B) | B | EXP (B) | |
Income growth | 0.066*** (0.002) | 1.068 | 0.069*** (0.002) | 1.071 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Subsidy growth | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.156*** (0.005) | 1.169 | 0.163*** (0.005) | 1.177 |
Gender |  |  | − 0.074 (0.065) | 0.929 |  |  | − 0.107 (0.067) | 0.899 |
Age |  |  | − 0.185*** (0.053) | 0.831 |  |  | − 0.127** (0.055) | 0.881 |
Education | Â | Â | 0.257*** (0.079) | 1.294 | Â | Â | 0.202** (0.082) | 1.223 |
Family size |  |  | − 0.042* (0.022) | 0.959 |  |  | 0.017 (0.022) | 1.017 |
Income type | Â | Â | 0.322*** (0.044) | 1.380 | Â | Â | 0.249*** (0.045) | 1.283 |
Income-level | Â | Â | 0.331*** (0.037) | 1.392 | Â | Â | 0.351*** (0.038) | 1.421 |
Time dummy variables (2021 as reference) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Year-2022 | − 0.955*** (0.104) | 0.385 | − 0.882*** (0.111) | 0.414 | − 1.078*** (0.112) | 0.340 | − 1.059*** (0.119) | 0.347 |
Area dummy variables (with reference to rural areas in the ecologically fragile region of the Loess Plateau) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Rural Northwest Arid Desert Ecologically Vulnerable Area | 1.439*** (0.086) | 4.215 | 1.428*** (0.091) | 4.170 | 1.412*** (0.091) | 4.102 | 1.457*** (0.096) | 4.294 |
Rural areas in the ecologically fragile region of the Tibetan Plateau | − 1.647*** (0.080) | 0.193 | − 1.875*** (0.093) | 0.153 | − 1.296*** (0.080) | 0.274 | − 1.505*** (0.093) | 0.222 |
Cox and Snell R2 | 0.315 | 0.341 | 0.304 | 0.327 | ||||
Nagelkerke R2 | 0.430 | 0.464 | 0.424 | 0.456 |