From: Social acceptance of geothermal technology on a global view: a systematic review
Author | Year | Title | Country | Type of method | Type of energy produced (e = electricity; h = heat; N/A = no information available) | Type of geothermal technology (dg = deep geothermal technology; gg = geothermal technology in general; o = other) | Social acceptance categories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Project organization and process | Environment | Municipality | Technology | Governance | |||||||
Allansdottir et al | 2019 | [65] | General | Literature review | N/A | dg | 2 | ||||
Baek et al | 2021 | [67] | South Korea | Content analysis | e | dg | 1 | 1 | |||
Questionnaire | |||||||||||
Balzan-Alzate et al | 2021 | [40] | Canada | Questionnaire | e | dg | 3 | 4 | |||
Colombia | |||||||||||
Chile | |||||||||||
Belgium | |||||||||||
France | |||||||||||
Blumer et al | 2018 | [41] | Switzerland | Questionnaire | e | dg | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Bronfman et al | 2012 | [42] | Chile | Questionnaire | e | gg | 1 | ||||
Carr-Cornish et al | 2014 | [25] | Australia | Focus groups | h, e | gg | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
Questionnaire | |||||||||||
Çetiner et al | 2016 | [43] | Turkey | Questionnaire | h, e | gg | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
Chavot et al | 2018 | [26] | France | Interviews | h, e | dg | 2 | 1 | |||
Case studies | |||||||||||
Content analysis | |||||||||||
Chavot et al | 2019 | [44] | France | Literature review | h, e | gg | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |
Contini et al | 2019 | [45] | General | Literature review | N/A | gg | 3 | 1 | |||
Cousse et al | 2021 | [27] | Switzerland | Questionnaire | h, e | gg | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||
Questionnaire | |||||||||||
Cuppen et al | 2020 | [46] | Switzerland | Case studies | h, e | dg | 1 | 3 | |||
Dowd et al | 2011 | [16] | Australia | Questionnaire | N/A | gg | 2 | 1 | |||
Focus groups | |||||||||||
Ejderyan et al | 2019 | [24] | Switzerland | Case studies | h, e | dg | 1 | ||||
González Acevedo et al | 2021 | [39] | Mexico | Case studies | e | gg | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
Interviews | |||||||||||
Questionnaire | |||||||||||
Hall et al | 2015 | [47] | Australia | Interviews | N/A | dg | 2 | ||||
Hariyadi et al | 2019 | [48] | Indonesia | Questionnaire | N/A | gg | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
Higgins et al | 2017 | [28] | USA | Questionnaire | e | o | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
Focus groups | |||||||||||
Interviews | |||||||||||
Hosseini et al | 2018 | [29] | Iran | Questionnaire | N/A | gg | 1 | 1 | |||
Literature review | |||||||||||
Hymans et al | 2021 | [49] | Japan | Case studies | N/A | gg | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Hymans | 2021 | [50] | Japan | Case studies | e | gg | 2 | 2 | |||
Ibrohim et al | 2019 | [8] | Indonesia | Case studies | e | gg | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
Interviews | |||||||||||
Jung et al | 2016 | [51] | Finland | Questionnaire | h | o | 1 | ||||
Karytsas et al | 2019 | [10] | Greece | Literature review | e | dg | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
Kluge et al | 2016 | [30] | General | Interviews | N/A | dg | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||
Questionnaire | |||||||||||
Conjoint analysis | |||||||||||
Knoblauch et al | 2018 | [52] | General | Online experiment | N/A | dg | 1 | ||||
Knoblauch et al | 2019 | [31] | Switzerland | Questionnaire | h, e | dg | 1 | 1 | |||
Germany | Questionnaire | ||||||||||
Kubota et al | 2013 | [53] | Japan | Interviews | e | dg | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Kunze et al | 2017 | [17] | Germany | Online review | N/A | dg | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Malo et al | 2019 | [54] | Canada | Questionnaire | h, e | dg | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | |
Mosly et al | 2018 | [55] | Saudi Arabia | Questionnaire | h, e | gg | 1 | ||||
Oluoch et al | 2020 | [32] | Kenya | Questionnaire | e | dg | 1 | 1 | |||
Pellizzone et al | 2015 | [68] | Italy | Questionnaire | h, e | gg | 1 | 1 | |||
Focus groups | |||||||||||
Pellizzone et al | 2016 | [33] | Italy | Questionnaire | h, e | gg | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
Focus groups | |||||||||||
Qorizki et al | 2021 | [34] | Indonesia | Questionnaire | h, e | gg | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
Questionnaire | |||||||||||
Radzi et al | 2014 | [56] | General | Literature review | N/A | gg | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Ratio et al | 2020 | [35] | Philippines | Case studies | N/A | gg | 3 | ||||
Questionnaire | |||||||||||
Focus groups | |||||||||||
Ratio et al | 2019 | [66] | Philippines | Literature review | e | gg | 3 | 2 | |||
Romanach et al | 2015 | [57] | Australia | Content analysis | e | gg | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
Rosso-Cerón et al | 2015 | [58] | Colombia | Questionnaire | N/A | dg | 1 | 1 | |||
Ruef et al | 2020 | [36] | Switzerland | Focus groups | N/A | gg | 1 | ||||
Observation | |||||||||||
Stauffacher et al | 2015 | [59] | Switzerland | Content analysis | h, e | dg | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
Trevisan et al | 2013 | [37] | Germany | Content analysis | N/A | dg | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Content analysis | |||||||||||
van der Zwaan et al | 2019 | [60] | Kenya | Questionnaire | N/A | gg | 1 | 1 | |||
Vargas-Payera | 2018 | [18] | Chile | Interviews | h, e | gg | 4 | 1 | 2 | ||
Vargas-Payera et al | 2020 | [38] | Chile | Interviews | N/A | dg | 1 | 1 | |||
Focus groups | |||||||||||
Case studies | |||||||||||
Wahyudi et al | 2019 | [61] | Indonesia | Questionnaire | N/A | gg | 1 | 1 | |||
Yasukawa | 2019 | [62] | Japan | Literature review | h, e | gg | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||
Yasukawa et al | 2018 | [63] | Japan | Questionnaire | N/A | gg | 1 | 3 | |||
Zaunbrecher et al | 2018 | [64] | Germany | Exploratory study | h | dg | 3 | 2 | 1 |