Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of studies considered in this literature review

From: Social acceptance of geothermal technology on a global view: a systematic review

Author

Year

Title

Country

Type of method

Type of energy produced (e = electricity; h = heat; N/A = no information available)

Type of geothermal technology (dg = deep geothermal technology; gg = geothermal technology in general; o = other)

Social acceptance categories

Project organization and process

Environment

Municipality

Technology

Governance

Allansdottir et al

2019

[65]

General

Literature review

N/A

dg

2

    

Baek et al

2021

[67]

South Korea

Content analysis

e

dg

1

 

1

  

Questionnaire

Balzan-Alzate et al

2021

[40]

Canada

Questionnaire

e

dg

3

4

   

Colombia

Chile

Belgium

France

Blumer et al

2018

[41]

Switzerland

Questionnaire

e

dg

  

1

1

1

Bronfman et al

2012

[42]

Chile

Questionnaire

e

gg

1

    

Carr-Cornish et al

2014

[25]

Australia

Focus groups

h, e

gg

1

3

3

1

 

Questionnaire

Çetiner et al

2016

[43]

Turkey

Questionnaire

h, e

gg

1

2

3

1

 

Chavot et al

2018

[26]

France

Interviews

h, e

dg

 

2

 

1

 

Case studies

Content analysis

Chavot et al

2019

[44]

France

Literature review

h, e

gg

1

4

1

3

 

Contini et al

2019

[45]

General

Literature review

N/A

gg

3

 

1

  

Cousse et al

2021

[27]

Switzerland

Questionnaire

h, e

gg

1

3

 

2

 

Questionnaire

Cuppen et al

2020

[46]

Switzerland

Case studies

h, e

dg

1

3

   

Dowd et al

2011

[16]

Australia

Questionnaire

N/A

gg

 

2

1

  

Focus groups

Ejderyan et al

2019

[24]

Switzerland

Case studies

h, e

dg

1

    

González Acevedo et al

2021

[39]

Mexico

Case studies

e

gg

2

2

3

  

Interviews

Questionnaire

Hall et al

2015

[47]

Australia

Interviews

N/A

dg

2

    

Hariyadi et al

2019

[48]

Indonesia

Questionnaire

N/A

gg

3

 

2

 

1

Higgins et al

2017

[28]

USA

Questionnaire

e

o

2

1

1

  

Focus groups

Interviews

Hosseini et al

2018

[29]

Iran

Questionnaire

N/A

gg

  

1

 

1

Literature review

Hymans et al

2021

[49]

Japan

Case studies

N/A

gg

1

 

1

 

1

Hymans

2021

[50]

Japan

Case studies

e

gg

2

   

2

Ibrohim et al

2019

[8]

Indonesia

Case studies

e

gg

3

2

3

1

 

Interviews

Jung et al

2016

[51]

Finland

Questionnaire

h

o

    

1

Karytsas et al

2019

[10]

Greece

Literature review

e

dg

1

1

2

1

 

Kluge et al

2016

[30]

General

Interviews

N/A

dg

4

2

2

  

Questionnaire

Conjoint analysis

Knoblauch et al

2018

[52]

General

Online experiment

N/A

dg

 

1

   

Knoblauch et al

2019

[31]

Switzerland

Questionnaire

h, e

dg

 

1

1

  

Germany

Questionnaire

Kubota et al

2013

[53]

Japan

Interviews

e

dg

2

1

1

 

2

Kunze et al

2017

[17]

Germany

Online review

N/A

dg

1

1

  

1

Malo et al

2019

[54]

Canada

Questionnaire

h, e

dg

4

5

2

2

 

Mosly et al

2018

[55]

Saudi Arabia

Questionnaire

h, e

gg

 

1

   

Oluoch et al

2020

[32]

Kenya

Questionnaire

e

dg

1

 

1

  

Pellizzone et al

2015

[68]

Italy

Questionnaire

h, e

gg

  

1

1

 

Focus groups

Pellizzone et al

2016

[33]

Italy

Questionnaire

h, e

gg

5

3

1

2

 

Focus groups

Qorizki et al

2021

[34]

Indonesia

Questionnaire

h, e

gg

2

1

4

2

1

Questionnaire

Radzi et al

2014

[56]

General

Literature review

N/A

gg

1

 

1

1

 

Ratio et al

2020

[35]

Philippines

Case studies

N/A

gg

3

    

Questionnaire

Focus groups

Ratio et al

2019

[66]

Philippines

Literature review

e

gg

3

 

2

  

Romanach et al

2015

[57]

Australia

Content analysis

e

gg

1

3

2

2

 

Rosso-Cerón et al

2015

[58]

Colombia

Questionnaire

N/A

dg

1

   

1

Ruef et al

2020

[36]

Switzerland

Focus groups

N/A

gg

1

    

Observation

Stauffacher et al

2015

[59]

Switzerland

Content analysis

h, e

dg

2

  

1

1

Trevisan et al

2013

[37]

Germany

Content analysis

N/A

dg

2

1

1

1

 

Content analysis

van der Zwaan et al

2019

[60]

Kenya

Questionnaire

N/A

gg

 

1

1

  

Vargas-Payera

2018

[18]

Chile

Interviews

h, e

gg

4

1

2

  

Vargas-Payera et al

2020

[38]

Chile

Interviews

N/A

dg

1

 

1

  

Focus groups

Case studies

Wahyudi et al

2019

[61]

Indonesia

Questionnaire

N/A

gg

 

1

1

  

Yasukawa

2019

[62]

Japan

Literature review

h, e

gg

3

 

1

 

1

Yasukawa et al

2018

[63]

Japan

Questionnaire

N/A

gg

1

3

   

Zaunbrecher et al

2018

[64]

Germany

Exploratory study

h

dg

3

 

2

1